Comments on Rule 69 by Major Groups and Stakeholders

dc.conference.date	2014-03-24 - 2014-03-28	en
dc.conference.title	UNEP Open-Ended CPR 2014
dc.contributor.author	United Nations Environment Programme
dc.contributor.organization	Governance Affairs Office
dc.date.accessioned	2016-12-23T09:36:52Z
dc.date.available	2016-12-23T09:36:52Z
dc.date.issued	2014-03-27
dc.description	Thank you, Madame Chair. I deliver this brief statement on behalf of all Major Groups and Regional Representatives. We had prepared a longer statement with specific text improvement regarding rule 69, on the basis of the proposal presented by the G77 and China. However, it seems that the discussion is not yet that far. Accordingly, we only wish to recall that GC decision 27/2 calls for strengthening the current framework for stakeholder engagement, in order to improve the new UNEP and enhance its role as the leading environmental authority. In this regard, the RoP should reflect best practices at UNEP and the High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. At the same time, the RoP should also enable continuous improvement and guarantee against non-regression.	en
dc.description.uri	https://www.unep.org/civil-society/Portals/24105/documents/meetings/oecpr2014/Statement%20on%20Rules%20of%20Procedure.pdf
dc.identifier.uri	https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/13732
dc.language	English
dc.subject.classification	Environmental Governance
dc.title	Comments on Rule 69 by Major Groups and Stakeholders	en
dc.type	Legal/convention record
wd.identifier.collection	Meeting Documents	en

Download

Showing 1 - 1 of 1